Monday, June 17, 2013

Man of Steel

2.5/4 stars

After the wise decision to abandon the story arc of 2006’s laborious Superman Returns and give the franchise a true reboot under the supervision of Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer, fans had hope that Man of Steel would be the film that finally does for Superman what Nolan and Goyer’s Dark Knight trilogy did for Batman. Seeing Zack Snyder, director of the excellent Watchmen adaptation, at the helm certainly didn’t hurt either. But Man of Steel is at best a partial success in this goal, burdened with an excess of increasingly meaningless action scenes and too little background to hold them together.

The film opens with an extended sequence set in the last days of Krypton, starring Russell Crowe as Superman’s biological father Jor-El and featuring plenty of action scenes of its own. This sequence serves to introduce the origin of Superman himself, as well as antagonist General Zod, and the primary McGuffin. The first thing that struck me was this film’s incredible lack of patience. It’s always providing us with beautiful, interesting things to look at and almost no time to take them in. This Kryptonian prelude manages to feel overwritten and underdeveloped at the same time.

When the movie gets going, it does manage to draw compelling versions of the Superman cast. Henry Cavill plays the title role with all the requisite charm and authority, and Amy Adams’ Lois Lane may be one of the best interpretations of the character yet. There are good supporting performances too, particularly Laurence Fishburne’s intimidating but fatherly Perry White. Two of my favorite television actors, Richard Schiff and Tahmoh Penikett, are also seen, but sorely underutilized. The script also provides plenty of interesting opportunities for dramatic hooks and variations on the known Superman mythos. But the film doesn’t seem to care about any of this back story it introduces, as it pushes aside any chance for real drama or unpredictable complications in favor of more straightforward action sequences. Superman has no time to establish himself as a hero, or have any interaction with most of his supporting cast, because the moment Clark Kent discover the truth about himself, he inadvertently broadcasts his location to General Zod and the rest of the Kryptonian refugees, and from there the action hardly takes a breath.

Michael Shannon’s turn as Zod is another missed opportunity. Shannon is a fantastic actor, capable of playing a rational yet ruthless enemy. But the plot robs him of any real chance to communicate with Superman with anything other than his fists, leaving the stakes of their conflict feeling half-baked. On the occasions when the movie does pause for a dramatic moment, it’s usually a flashback of young Clark being taught some formative lesson by Pa Kent. There’s nothing wrong with these scenes per se, and they’re made no worse by Kevin Costner’s familiar paternal presence, but Goyer hits the same note too many times, and in the process, misses the opportunity to have Clark’s character development more relevant to the people he interacts with in the main story.

Man of Steel has all the ingredients necessary to be the kind of superhero epic that stands beside The Dark Knight or the recent string of quality offerings from Marvel. But it isn’t that movie, nonetheless, because the filmmakers decided they had time for more explosions and special effects, but not enough for good storytelling.